Otherwise Called Nyhan s Syndrome - 1273 Words

Lesch-Nyhan Syndrome, otherwise called Nyhan’s syndrome, hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT) deficiency or juvenile gout, is a rare hereditary disorder that affects almost exclusively males at a very young age. Thereby, they develop neurological and behavioral abnormalities-physical handicaps, mental retardation and abnormal involuntary muscle movements- and the overproduction of uric acid. This paper will outline the Lesch-Nyhan syndromes genetic and metabolic components, symptoms and signs, how and when a patient should present to a physician, what makes the physician think that a patient has the disease, how it is diagnosed, the treatment and/or cure, and its longevity. The history of Lesch-Nyhan syndrome began first when it was discovered or recognized by Michael Lesch and William Nyhan. Michael Lesch and William Nyhan supplied the first detailed clinical characterization of Lesch-Nyhan disease in the year 1964 (H A Jinnah, 2015). Additionally, the defici ency of the enzyme hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase was observed by Seegmiller and associates in 1967 (H A Jinnah, 2015). Lesch-Nyhan Syndrome is genetically caused due to the deficiency of hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase or the HPRT1 gene mutation. The complete or acute deficiency of HRPT leads to this Lesch-Nyhan syndrome. The gene mutation is located in the X chromosome. The HPRT gene is found on the long arm of the X chromosome and the amino acid coding for HPRT isShow MoreRelatedThe Role Of Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation And Curing Disease2357 Words   |  10 Pagesamounts of circulating progenitor and HSC’s. It is possible to coax more stem and progenitor cells into peripheral blood by giving the donor or auto patient cytokines such as granulocyte colony stimulating factor afew days before collection. This is called mobilized peripheral blood and is now the preferred method of stem cell collection with around 5-20% of cells col lected being fully blood progenitor cells. For this method white blood cells and CD34 count are taken daily with harvest beginning once

Planning For My Senior Year Of College - 1496 Words

Planning for my senior year of college is one thing. Planning for my life after graduation is another story. I have no idea where my life will take me, so formulating a plan is challenging. No matter where I end up, I will be able to apply the skills I have learned into my professional role. In my role, I hope to give a presentation to my bosses lead a team meeting, and create an action plan. College has given me a lot of experience with giving presentations. I have been able to give them to one person or a large group of people. The more experience I have with them, the easier they become. I enjoy watching Ted Talks, as well as famous speeches because the people giving them are so eloquent and well spoken, and I aspire to be like them one day. Matthew McConaughey’s character in We Are Marshall gave a very inspiring speech towards the end of the movie. He motivated and inspired his team, both of which are feelings leaders should instill in all their team members. I will seek out opportunities to do so, such as giving a presentation of what I have leanred within my first year on the job. It seems simple, but it will give me a purpose to give one. Being able to give a presentation in a professional setting seems very daunting, and being able to give one within my first two years out of college will help this task seem less intimidating. Doing it earlier on i n my career will give me a chance to receive feedback so I can improve on future presentations I will beShow MoreRelatedMy Dreams Are Out There, Go Get Them1355 Words   |  6 Pagesfemale student stated, â€Å"If I go to college, I will be the first one in my family to go. It’s a sense of pride and honor that I’m gaining by going. College should be the pathway that all students take†. Going to college, getting a future education, and becoming a more knowledgeable person should be the desires of all high school seniors in today’s society. Methods/ Field Research Students Views on Future Education Four interviews were taken from four high school seniors at Green River High School in NovemberRead MoreThe Does Not Really Exist, But It Does Apply College Admissions?903 Words   |  4 Pagesbut it does apply to college admissions. It is important to remember that everything that is done in high school will be seen for college admissions. Colleges are vague when discussing what they want from an applicant. They discuss what they are looking for, however, they do not get into the specifics or give examples of top applicants. To get into a desirable college, one must read constantly, follow a passion consistently, and plan time methodically; doing so will show colleges that a student hasRead MoreThe Gap Year1052 Words   |  5 PagesThe Gap Year As a senior in high school did you ever stress about your future? Making plans for college? A way to relieve stress could be to take a gap year. The life of the average senior consist of planning for college, by taking a year off you can manage and make money, relieve some stress and it gives you the opportunity to travel before settling down before college. This is not uncommon to a lot of senior graduates. They see it as a way to relax and mentally prepare themselves for the futureRead MoreThe College Success Course646 Words   |  3 Pagesgo to college but the lack of higher education affects the entire community as a whole. Without a bachelor’s degree, students are less likely to be employed, more likely to live in poverty, and are less active citizens of their community. Students with a low level of education are also more likely of welfare dependency and crime. In order to raise the 12% college educated citizens in Bogalusa, high school juniors and seniors of Bogalu sa High School should be required to complete a college successRead MoreThe Road Not Taken By Robert Frost973 Words   |  4 Pagessometimes life changing. My challenging decision took me down a rocky path my senior year deciding a career. There are numerous careers and colleges to choose from; however, a student can only choose one. Unlike the majority of my classmates, my career ideas switched, what seemed like, every month. The beginning of my senior year I had a full ride scholarship to Cowley County Community College, but I was already dead set on attending Wichita State to be a nurse, following in my mother’s footsteps. AfterRead MoreMy Campaign For A Senior Executive Service1750 Words   |  7 PagesMy primary short-term academic goal is to earn my Associate of Applied Science degree in Business Administration with a concentration in Event and Meeting Planning before the end of 2016. My short-term plan includes reducing and eliminating the academic tuition cost from out of my pocket by obtaining scholarships, grants and tuition assistance from my employer and sponsors. Further, I plan to reduce the time required to obtain the degree, to quickly have the necessary skills and education to jump-startRead MoreI m Spent The Best $ 400 Of My Life Essay1181 Words   |  5 Pagesâ€Å"I just spent the best $400 of my life.† In May of 2016, I, as just a high school student, became a college s tudent, with just the click of a button. Pressing that small button online to accept my offer to attend Purdue lifted the burden that was pressing down on me. In life there are big decisions and small decisions. Choosing what shoes to wear, whether to take the bus or just walk, and what to get to eat are small choices; they matter in the present, but usually have no long-lasting impactsRead MoreMy Lifelong Goals Essay684 Words   |  3 Pagesgoals. I remember starting High School and my teachers asking me what my goals were. I always answered with â€Å"to get all A’s in my classes† or â€Å"to do well in school.† To this day I still have many goals for myself and have achieved some of the ones i’ve made. I have completed up to High School level, and not failed a single class, which is one of the goals I made for myself when I entered HIgh School. I didn’t want to fail because that would appear on my transcript and make completing High SchoolRead MoreCareer Development And Planning Serves Five Essential Purpose1331 Words   |  6 PagesAfter discussing future’s plan with Amanda, she discussed he r future plans of becoming Human Resources Director in ten years. Career development and planning serves five essential purpose: encourage, develop new skills, alleviate plateauing, satisfy employment, and increase employment. My ultimate goal when developing a model a career planning for Amanda, I would want to use the Waterloo University Model. I would want to model each essential factors of the key points stages. These stages includeRead MoreAn Analysis On Financial Struggles1122 Words   |  5 PagesCollege Admissions: An Analysis on Financial Struggles As inflation in the United States continues to rise, as does the cost of many things, specifically college fees. In a world such as the one we live in today, it is extremely hard to attain a successful career without a college degree. Although, one may end up spending their entire life trying to pay off their college debts in order to get a degree. While the knowledge and skills attained during college are extremely beneficial later on in life

Essay From Atheism to Theism

Question: From Atheism to Theism So, why did the worlds most prominent atheist Anthony Flew (1923-2010) come to change his mind after 40 years of philosophical engagement with issues surrounding belief, perception, knowledge, and meaning ? You could read through the (eminently accessible) book he wrote with Roy Varghese, Why There Is a God (New York: Harper One, 2007), distil from it the main reasons for his conversion, and spell out in greater detail just what it entailed. Answer: Antony Garrard Newton Flew, was born in the year 1923 was a celebrated English philosopher. Antony was a strong atheist and possessed an analytic and evidentialist thought regarding life and the existence of God. Antony Flew was never ready to believe in the God or the presence of superpower until he gets empirical evidence about the existence of God in the universe (Blackford, Schuklenk, 2013). His belief on the non-existence of God was so strong that it was from the age of 15 that he started believing that there is no God. Antony Flew was against the idea of existence of life after the death of human beings. In his entire lifetime, he only believed in evidence and finally in the year 2004, he started believing in the Aristotelian God. While he started believing in the Aristotelian God, he stated that it is his lifelong motto to follow where the evidence leads and finally when he got the evidence of the existence of God, he is ready to believe in the presence of the superpower (Cur ran, 2012). The highlighting work in the lifetime of Antony Flew was the book, There is a God: How the World's Most Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind which Antony Flew has written along with Roy Abraham Varghese (Crawley, 2015). However, the book was made a subject of controversy when an article claiming that Antony Flew mentally declined that was published in the New York Times magazine. The article also claimed that the book was mainly a work of Varghese. However, Antony Flew denied the allegations by the article. Flew stated that the ideas presented in the book belonged to flew himself but due to the old age, it was Varghese who did the most of the writing part in the book (DeWitt, Brown, 2013). Some of the distinct works by Antony Flew other than the book with Roy Abraham Varghese are (Goodreads.com, 2015): How to Think Straight: An Introduction to Critical Reasoning A Dictionary of Philosophy An Introduction to Western Philosophy God Philosophy Thinking about Social Thinking New Essays In Philosophical Theology Body, Mind, and Death Thinking Straight Essays On Logic And Language Darwinian Evolution Dios existe Hume: Philosopher of Moral Science Hume's Philosophy of Belief: A Study of His First Inquiry Merely Mortal?: Can You Survive Your Own Death? What Universal Natural Rights? Antony Flew was a strong atheist from the age of fifteen. In addition to this, Flew had a tendency of believing something, which has a strong evidence to support the claim. Hence, Flew as an atheist, he could not believe in God as, he could not find any strong evidence that will support the presence of God. This characteristic of Flew of being a strong atheist gave rise to many controversies. While Flew was in Oxford, he was the part of the Socratic club, which was the main place of debate between the Christians and the atheists. The president of the Socratic club was C.S Lewis. Flew in the club presented a paper with the title, Theology of Falsification, which argued there are many statements on the theory regarding the existence of god (Flew, 2000). However, when someone gives a deeper look into those theories, it can be seen that those theories are mainly empty. Flew quoted while presenting his Theology of Falsification, I was not saying that statements of religious belief were me aningless. I simply challenged religious believers to explain how their statements are to be understood, especially in the light of conflicting data (p. 45) (Goodreads.com, 2015). The Theology of Falsification, which was presented in the year 1950, was the centre of argument even years after it was published. After Theology of Falsification, the next atheist work of Flew was God and Philosophy. In God and Philosophy, Flew attempted to evaluate the Christian belief on theism. Flew sported atheism in the book by saying, the design, cosmological, and moral arguments for Gods existence are invalid (p. 49). He later argued that one should first define the concept of god before believing in the existence of god in the universe (Fradd, 2015). It was in the ear 1971, that Antony Flew published the book, the Presumption of Atheism, which is considered to be the final book of Flew on the concept of atheism (Flew, 1976). According to the book, the atheists hold a more rational position in the argument between atheism and theism. The atheists hold a much position by questioning the existence of God in the universe and it is the theists, who bear the burden of proving that God exists in the society. Alvin Plantinga who was a critical logician criticized the book (Williams, 2005). According to him, the belief in god is properly basic for all human beings. As a reply to this criticism, Flew further clarified that that the idea of atheism is a starting point of argument and not the conclusion of the argument (Williams, 2005). By keeping atheism the base, people should start finding evidence of the existence of God, which will finally lead to the acceptance of God by human being. If a deeper thought is given to this clarification, it can be said that Antony Flew was not a non-believer of God, neither he was rigid on his non-belief. He just a wanted a proof of existence of God. When he will get an evidence of the presence of God, he will start believing on the existence of god. Antony flew believed that everything that is happening in the universe should be understood in the terms of laws of nature. Flew states that, when on one hand, the theists fundamental assumption is the presence of god in the universe, on the other hand, flew presumed the universe the fundamental assumption (Frede, 2011). Flews belief was strongly presented in the book, Philosophy of religion a guide and anthology by Brian Davies (Davies, 1993). In the book of by Brian Davies, the parable by Antony flew as he mentions in Theology of Falsification gets a special mention. Antony Flews disbelieve in God was strongly felt in the work, Theology and Falsification. In the theology of falsification, refers the work of John Wisdom where he argues upon the presence of God by giving the example of a garden. Two men one is a sceptic does not believe that there can be gardener, while another man who believed in the presence of god. To feel the presence of gardener, the two men set up a barbed wire with electric current in the wire and keep a bloodhound. However, there was no disturbance. The person who believed that there is God, states that the gardener was someone who is invisible, cannot be torched, without any scent and insensible to any electric shock or pain. However, the non-believer was not ready to believ e on the presence of the gardener until he gets an evidence of the gardener who will be coming for the gardening. Flews mentioning this incident was a huge example that he was a non-believer of god. In addition to this, it can also be seen that Flew was a ardent believer of evidence. He mentions this parable to make the readers understand that evidence the best way to prove that there is God who is the creator of everything in the universe (Gravil, 2011). After spending his life as an atheist, at the end of his life, Antony Flew started believing that there is the presence of God in the universe. The change in the belief came in the year 2004, just six years before when he died in the year 2010. Some critics say that at the end of life, the mental condition of Antony Flew declined and hence, he wrote the book, There is a God the ending years of his life peacefully. The book, There is a God: How the World's Most Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind was written along with the co-author Abrahams Varghese (Flew Varghese, 2004). Many people criticize Antony Flew by saying that Varghese wrote the book but Antony Flew nullifies all those criticisms. Antony flew opened up in an interview with Dr. Benjamin Wiker. Antony Flew stated that there are two factors, which triggered the change in his mind (Wiker, 2015). The first factor is the growing empathy of Flew with the insight of some notable scientists, which includes Einstein. Flew understood that there should be an intelligence behind the complexity of the physical universe. The second factor was the insight of Antony Flew himself. According to Flew, the complexity of human life is even more complicated than the physics of the universe. Hence, it made him to think that there should be one source of energy, which is controlling the physics of human life as well as the physics of the universe (Collins, 2015). Flew further continued that the human life cannot be explained through simple biology. There should be something more to this, the human life, which the genetic code must not be able to identify. Flew further discovered that the difference between life and non-life has something to do with more than biology. The force that controls the time between life and non-life is not chemical but ontological (Collins, 2015). Flew even answered the critics who criticized his decision regarding changing to a theist from an atheist by saying that it is not that he heard a voice, b ut he followed the evidence and it lead him to theism. Wikers next question was about the book by Flew, Presumption of Atheism. Flew has argued that atheism is the starting point from where the argument should start reading the existence of god in this universe (Wiker, 2015). However, now that flew has changed his views existence of the God, then the burden of proof will also be on Flew now, to this Flew replied that many philosophers also believe that the burden of proof is on the atheists. He further added that the he has mentioned in the book that a central and stronger force controls the origin of the laws of the nature and the physics of life. The burden of proof is neither on the theists or the atheist but in those people who do not believe that the there is a central force in the universe who control the forces in the universe (Herzman, 2013). Wiker also asked Flew regarding the scientific approach that the author has used to draw the evidence, which led him to the inference that there is an existence in god. Flew answered the inference that he had drawn from the approach was philosophical in nature. The scientists being steeped into science will not be able to draw philosophical inference. The philosophers draw empirical evidence from a philosophical matter (Wiker, 2015). Wiker questioned Flew regarding the works of the Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens who believe that those who follow God are behind times. To the question, Flew again referred to philosophical implications. He calls Dawkins dishonest because Dawkins is trying to infer a philosophical implication by applying scientific perspective. In addition to this, two famous philosophers, Thomas Nagel and Anthony Kenny have also pointed pot that the Dawkins has failed to refer three major issues related to the existence of God (Wiker, 2015). Dawkins support the issues, but those are the same issues, which led Flew to believe that there is God in this universe. The three major issues are life with its teleological organization, the existence of the universe and the laws of nature. These three major issues support the fact that there is a central power that controls the living beings and forces of the nature (Holden, 2012). The change in mind of flew is the result of this major issues which is identified in the chapters. Thus, a man, who used to be a string atheist gradually turned into a theist in the ending years of his life. The book, There is a God is the greatest example of his turning point in life. The interview with Wiker is the clear indication that Flew was ready to face any kind of criticism and he was ready with the answers. Flew entirely believes in science and according to him, science is the only truth which led him to believe that there is a presence of God in the universe (Kazan, 2010). The fine-tuning argument mainly leads to the pointer of God. The fine-tuning argument presents how the physical constant of the nature and the beginning of the universe beautifully converge to a common point that there is one creator of all the activities in the universe (BioLogos, 2011). It seems that the physical constant of nature like the gravity and the density of the universe is created at one point of time and gave rise to life in the universe. A slight variation in the theories or the density would have resulted in a great distortion in nature (Logicmuseum.com, 2015). However, as it did not happen hence, the fine-tuning argument proves that there is tuning between the scientific theories and the beginning of the universe which is done by a single creator in the universe (Hudson, Diego, Wigelsworth, 2014). While talking about the existence in god in the book, There Is a God, Antony Flew presented the fine-tuning argument. Antony Flew explained the presence of God by comparing the life of a man being with a hotel room. He asked readers to imagine that a person has entered a hotel room. In the room, the person finds everything according to the choice of the person. The room is decorated according to the choice of the individual, there is music playing which the person likes, the bar possess the drinks that the person likes with the favourite candies and cookies. In fact, the mineral water bottle is according o the choice of the person. The person will become overwhelmed by the idea. Gradually, the person will start thinking that the hotel managers and the officials had an idea about the choice of the person and they had decorated according to the choice of the person. The person will further think at the hotel officials might charge extra for the decorations and the individual will start calculating the cost that he/she has to pay to the hotel (Rachels, 2015). While the person is thinking about the concrete part of the arrangement, the individual at some point of time might think that someone is there who knew all about the choices and has informed the people who in turn has arranged the things (Joshi, 2011). The person might not be able to explain who that person is but might have a feeling of a presence of an invisible person who has a prior idea about the choices of the person (Rachels, 2015). Antony Flew was attracted to the fine-tuning after he was influenced by the intelligent debate, which was initiated by Michael in the book, Darwins black box: the biochemical calling to evolution. Antony Flew was also interested in William Dembskis book the Design Inference: eliminating chance through small probabilities. When on one hand, the fine-tuning argument support the scientific theories and the beginning of the universe to prove the existence of god, on the other hand, cosmological argument says that the existence of the universe and the world is itself the biggest example of the existence of God. The simple cosmological argument states the following facts (Christianteaching.org.uk, 2015): Everything that exists in the inverse must have a cause behind the existence of all the things As the universe exists, this is a fact, hence: The universe will also have a cause why it is existing He only cause that is behind the cause of the existence of the universe and the only cause of existence is god Thus, god also exists However, Antony Flew when he was an atheist rejected the cosmological argument as the argument fails to provide a strong of evidence to support the fact. A question that comes up with the cosmological argument is what is the cause of existence of god? If everything has a cause of existence, then God should also have a case of existence (Deem, 2015). As God is the cause of existence of the universe then when there is no cause of existence of God then the universe should also not exist. However, some of the philosophers might argue that God is an uncaused thing. Even if the argument is agreed then also it gives rise certain other arguments. The entire cosmological argument, which is based in the cause of existence, becomes false (Goodreads.com, 2015). In addition to this, the philosophers who support the cosmological argument will have nothing to prove further to evolve the cosmological argument as the base if the argument is false (Kaku, Cohen, 2012). Thus, the cosmological argument takes the path to nowhere. Antony Flew who was an ardent follower of evidence could not follow the cosmological argument of existence of God. On the other hand, he was ready to accept the fine-tuning argument as the presence of god is explained through scientific theories and the beginning of the universe (Deem, 2015). Thus, it can be said that the perspective of Antony Flew is based in pure science and evidence. Flew very intelligently made out the difference between the fine-tuning argument and the cosmological argument. Moreover, the constant stress on the fine-tuning argument is another proof that the path of atheism to theism for Antony Flew is entirely based on evidence. The argument of first cause can be an extended form of the cosmological argument that its god who created everything in the universe. God is the one who created the universe and the life in the universe. God is the one who has been the creator of every single being in this earth as well as other planets in the universe and the life on the planets. The fist cause argument keeps god as the cause and then develops further theories on this cause (Leech, 2013). However, the atheists argue the theory by saying that what is the cause of God when there should be cause behind everything (Luehrmann, 2011). However, the scientists are then challenged by the big bang theory, which is taken to be the birth of the universe by many scientists. When the big bang theory is further examined, it can be seen that at one pint of time, the big bang theory fails to prove nay law that proves that big bang theory is the ultimate cause of the birth of the universe. Thus, the problem between the atheism and theism will keep on going, and it will impossible to reach a decision regarding the birth of the universe and the existence of God. When on one hand, the theists believe that God is creator, the atheists will prove them wrong and vice versa (McCormick, 2012). This can be the main reason why Antony Flew lived the life of both a theist and an atheist. Though he says that he has found a proper reason and evidence of the presence of god, yet he was unable to prove with evidence. However, it is also true that there is a fine-tuning that the birth of the universe took place at the correct time and the correct place. The human being came in the earth at the right point of time. Hence, one cannot entirely overlook this theory by Antony Flew. However, it is not possible to know nothing more about the first cause as the argument will be ever ending. The argument starts from a point where God is taken to be the creator of everything in the universe; however, the philosophers are not able to prove the argument, as there is no cause of the existence of God (Meynell, 2011). Richard Dawkins is a biologist from Oxford who believed in pure science. According to Dawkins, believing in God is like believing a teapot revolving around Mars (Dawkins, 2006). It is the human nature to develop a sense of gratitude towards a being and they believe in thanks giving. Hence, human beings searched for giving thanks to someone for the good things in life and when they found nobody, they created the figure of god and religion to give thanks to. He applied pure science to everything happens in the universe. Dawkins said that the stars are made not due to accident but they are important parts of the universe, which keeps the ability to make us (Collins, 2015). However, it was nit the job of the stars to make us. According to Dawkins words in the Ancestors Tale- a pilgrimage to the dawn of evolution, It is just that without stars there would be no atoms heavier than lithium in the periodic table (Dawkins, 2006). Once in a speech that Dawkins delivered in an auditorium at Christchurch, New Zealand he said it is just luck, that the human beings are in the earth. Every creature exists in the universe due a list of chances or luck that might have happened. The evolution of mankind and all other creatures in the earth is pure luck. There is no other truth beyond this luck or chance. (Kazan, 2010) Dawkins also believes that just as life has developed in the earth, similarly by stroke of luck, life must have developed in some planets in the universe. Dawkins has explained himself as religious non-believer. In addition to this, he is an ardent follower of Darwin and believes in origin of species(Kazan, 2010). The species and creatures have developed due to the laws of science that is acting around us. It is because the planet revolves and rotates due to the cyclic law of gravity, there is birth of creature as well as end (Palmer, 2013). Antony Flew also believed in evidence to reach a proper conclusion. As an atheist, he has a thought quite similar to Robert Dawkins. He was not ready to believe that there is a superpower that should be prayed. Every end and beginning has proper science. However, as a theist, he believed there is one invisible being that is controlling the activities (BioLogos, 2011). However, after he became theist, he claimed that he has a got the evidence that he was searching for and was sure that there is a science that has given birth to the universe. To be accurate, he related science with God and eventually started believing in god. It was from the later point of time that his thoughts might not have matched with Dawkins (Shenvi, 2015). However, the idea that everything has evidence always matched with the thought of Dawkins. The life of Antony Flew took an about turn in the year 2004. A strong believer of atheism started believing in god. A being, which he used to believe, does not exist started believing that being to be the creator of the universe. The sudden change gave rise to various criticisms. Through an article published by Richard Carrier it was understood how flew started believing in religion (Carrier, 2015). However, his take on religion was questionable. According to Richard flew is confused about his take in religion as flew has not yet decided that what he believes in. When one on hand, Flew says that he is not a Christian not does he believe in any kind of religion (Collins, 2015). In addition to this, he also does not believe in afterlife as mentioned in Merely Mortal: can you survive your own death, on the other hand, he believes there is a presence of almighty in the universe that is controlling the life in the universe (Carrier, 2015). According to Flew, he believes in the religion of Aristotelian metaphysics. He believes in gods who is more like an Aristotelian god. Flew believed in a God is present at a distance from the human beings and an impersonal prime mover (Power, 2012). According to Carrier, the existence in God is a hypothesis for him. He is experimenting about the existence of god and once he is done with the experiment, he will be able to give his final thoughts regarding the presence of God in the universe.ths, the God according to Antony Flew, is like science. Similarly, as the scientists who are experiments with different scientific element and after the experiments are done, the scientists are able to reach a decision. Flew also experimented with God as the prime force and then he tried to position all his assumption and depending on that, Flew drew a conclusion that there is a being called God who is capable of creating the universe and is responsible for all the happenings all around the world (D eem, 2015). Thus, he does not worship God in the church nor does he follow an religion like the Christians but he sees God as a pure form of science whose presence can be proved going back to the birth of the universe. As flew was not ready to submit to any kind of religion to prove his belief in god, similarly, he did not believe in worship. However, he believed that whenever a person is commenting on an issue or an existence, then the person should be moral in the approach (Silversides, 2012). If one of the people is trying to prove a point then the person should not adopt an immoral way of proving the point. In fact, Flew himself followed the path of morality. His actions suggested hi attitude. Though he believed in God in the later years if his life but he never promoted any religion as he said that he believes in god as a form of science. In addition to this, the theme of morality extends to the presence God as well. Flew suggested that the presence of God is the justification of morality in the society. Antony Flew even went ahead of mentioning C.S Lewis of the Socratic club where Lewis used to teach about morality and God (BioLogos, 2011). Flew could not relate to the morality as taught by L ewis. According to Lewis, half of the shelves in the university library were full of books written by Lewis. When a person is teaching about morality then he should be able to refer other authors who have talked about the meaning of morality (Aikin, Talisse, 2011). It is then that the work of the teacher will be well appreciated by other authors and his teachings will gain a true meaning. Flew refers to the Aristotelian god whenever he was questioned about his belief in God. Flew believe in a God who has the power to create the universe as well as possess the intelligence to create the living beings at the correct time and at the correct place (Rachels, 2015). After becoming an atheist, the God is much more stringer to flew than he was ever before. However, later in his life when he became a theist, he even started believing in the cosmological argument. This turning point also gives rise to the question of argument. The cosmological argument fails to find a cause of the existence of God. Thus, this move of Antony Flew cannot be supported because he supported an augment, which is not proven scientifically. Much has been written about the concept of atheism and the theism. Thus, it can be concluded that the conflict between the atheist and the theist will never end. One of the most famous names among the conflict between atheism and the theism is Antony Flew. The most interesting thing about Antony Flew is that from being a strong atheist he went on being one of the strongest believer of theism. The essay has thrown light on the journey of Anton Flew from a celebrated atheist to being a theist. As a result, many arguments have been cited in the essay to support as well as question the change of mind of Antony Flew (Habermas, 2004). Throughout his life, Antony Flew only believed in evidence. As an atheist, he was not ready to believe in God, as he was not able to find any evidence that will support the existence of God. As a theist as well, he said that it is the science and the laws of nature that made him believe there is a superpower that is controlling the universe. He was an ardent supporter of the fine-tuning argument as it says that the creation of the universe and the birth of the human being at the correct time indicate that there is a superpower who is responsible for the happenings around the universe (Watkin, 2011). Though much criticism has been done regarding the change in mind of Antony Flew, yet both the perspective of Antony Flew cannot be overlooked. As an atheist, he made a strong point that people should be able to present evidence about the presence of God in the universe. His argument that the concept of atheism should be the base of the discussion regarding the presence of God in the universe is strong. Based on the disbelief in God, the theists can present the argument that there is the presence of God in the universe (Logicmuseum.com, 2015). As a theist as well, his idea cannot be overlooked. Flews point of view that there is a superpower who is controlling the laws of nature and the beginning of the universe has a strong base. However, Antony Flew was unable to give any proof regarding the presence of God in the universe. He said that he followed evidence to reach the final decision that there is a God, but he was not able to give any prove to the readers regarding the presence of God in the universe. Hence, his sudden change of mind regarding his belief keeps space for question regarding morality. References Aikin, S., Talisse, R. (2011). Reasonable atheism. Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books. BioLogos,. (2011).What is the "fine-tuning" of the universe, and how does it serve as a "pointer to God"?. Retrieved 29 December 2015, from https://biologos.org/common-questions/gods-relationship-to-creation/fine-tuning Blackford, R., Schuklenk, U. (2013). 50 great myths about atheism. Hoboken: John Wiley. Carrier, R. (2015).Secular Web Kiosk: Antony Flew Considers God...Sort Of.Infidels.org. Retrieved 29 December 2015, from https://infidels.org/kiosk/article/antony-flew-considers-godsort-of-369.html Christianteaching.org.uk,. (2015).Atheist Philosopher Antony Flew Embraces Belief in God - Christian Teaching Resources. Retrieved 29 December 2015, from https://www.christianteaching.org.uk/antonyflewembracesgod.html Collins, H. (2015).Review There is a God by Antony Flew - creation.com.Creation.com. Retrieved 29 December 2015, from https://creation.com/review-there-is-a-god-by-antony-flew Crawley, W. (2015). Will and Testament. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/ni/2010/04/antony_flew_the_atheist_who_ch.html Curran, M. (2012). Atheism, religion and enlightenment in pre-revolutionary Europe. Woodbridge, Suffolk, UK: Royal Historical Society. Davies, B. (1993).An introduction to the philosophy of religion. Oxford [England]: Oxford University Press. Dawkins, R. (2006).The God delusion. Deem, R. (2015).Quotes from Scientists Regarding Design of the Universe.Godandscience.org. Retrieved 29 December 2015, from https://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/quotes.html DeWitt, J., Brown, E. (2013). Hope after faith. Boston, MA: Da Capo Press. Flew, A. (1976).The presumption of atheism and other philosophical essays on God, freedom, and immortality. New York: Barnes Noble. Flew, A. (2000). Theology and falsification.Philosophy Now,29, 28-29. Flew, A., Varghese, R. (2004).There is a god(1st ed.). Retrieved from https://islamicblessings.com/upload/There-is-a-God.pdf Fradd, M. (2015). 20 answers. [S.l.]: Catholic Truth Society. Frede, V. (2011). Doubt, atheism, and the nineteenth-century Russian intelligentsia. Madison, Wis.: University of Wisconsin Press. Goodreads.com,. (2015).Antony Flew Quotes (Author of There Is a God). Retrieved 29 December 2015, from https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/143385.Antony_Flew Goodreads.com,. (2015).Books by Antony Flew (Author of There Is a God). Retrieved 29 December 2015, from https://www.goodreads.com/author/list/143385.Antony_Flew Gravil, R. (2011). Grasmere 2011. Penrith, CA: Humanities-Ebooks. Habermas, G. (2004).My Pilgrimage from Atheism to Theism: A Discussion between Antony Flew and Gary Habermas(1st ed.). Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1336context=lts_fac_pubs Herzman, A. (2013). The Concept of Atheism. Cork: BookBaby. Holden, T. (2012). Spectres of false divinity. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press. Hudson, W., Diego, L., Wigelsworth, J. (2014). Atheism and deism revalued. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Ltd. Joshi, S. (2011). The unbelievers. Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books. Kaku, M., Cohen, J. (2012). The best American science writing, 2012. New York: Ecco Press. Kazan, C. (2010).Richard Dawkins: "The Stroke of Luck that Led to Life on Earth Exists Elsewhere in the Universe" (Weekend Feature).Dailygalaxy.com. Retrieved 29 December 2015, from https://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2010/03/ricard-dawkins-the-stroke-of-luck-that-led-to-life-on-earth-exists-elsewhere-in-the-universe-weekend.html Leech, D. (2013). The hammer of the Cartesians. Leuven: Peeters. Logicmuseum.com,. (2015).Aristotle on the existence of God. Retrieved 29 December 2015, from https://www.logicmuseum.com/ontological/aristotleontological.htm Luehrmann, S. (2011). Secularism Soviet style. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. McCormick, M. (2012). Atheism and the case against Christ. Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books. Meynell, H. (2011). The epistemological argument against atheism. Lewiston, N.Y.: Edwin Mellen Press. Palmer, M. (2013). Atheism for beginners. Cambridge: Lutterworth Press. Power, M. (2012). Adieu to God. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell. Rachels, J. (2015).Does Morality Depend on Religion.Faculty.uca.edu. Retrieved 29 December 2015, from https://faculty.uca.edu/rnovy/Rachels%20--%20Does%20Morality%20Depend%20on%20Religion.htm Shenvi, N. (2015).A Brief Response to the God Delusion by Richard Dawkins.Shenvi.org. Retrieved 29 December 2015, from https://www.shenvi.org/Essays/DawkinsResponse.htm Silversides, M. (2012). Faith in the age of science. Durham: Sacristy Press. Watkin, C. (2011). Difficult atheism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Wiker, D. (2015).How the Worlds Most Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind.Strange Notions. Retrieved 29 December 2015, from https://www.strangenotions.com/flew/ Williams, P. (2005).A Change of Mind for Antony Flew.bethinking.org. Retrieved 29 December 2015, from https://www.bethinking.org/does-god-exist/a-change-of-mind-for-antony-flew

The tragic deaths of Romeo and Juliet Essay Example For Students

The tragic deaths of Romeo and Juliet Essay The tragic deaths of Romeo and Juliet could have been avoided if many of the events that took place during the play had not occurred. Romeo and Juliet did not influence their own deaths as much as the other characters around them did. The events that took place may have only happened by coincidence, not a higher force. Thus there are three things that could have caused the deaths; other characters in the play, coincidence and fate. All of the characters in this play made choices which have an affect on events that come about thus causing the deaths. All of these characters have different traits and personalities which influence the decisions that they make. Romeo is a leading character in the play, he is a teenage boy in the later years of adolescence, I get the impression that he is in the age range eighteen to twenty-one. He is the eldest son of Lord and Lady Montague. He spends his time mostly with a group of friends, little of whom are known to the audience, only Benvolio, Mercutio and Balthazar. He falls deeply in love with Juliet, the only child of Lord and Lady Capulet. We will write a custom essay on The tragic deaths of Romeo and Juliet specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now The first time Romeo appears on stage he is behaving like a love sick teenager, he claims to be mourning over the lack of love a girl named Rosalind shows toward him (Act 1 Scene 1). However he is quick to forget these feelings as in Act 1 Scene 5 he falls in love with Juliet. This behaviour shows spontaneity and a need for drama. The fact that he was so keen to dismiss the feelings seen in Act 1 Scene 1 and transfers his feelings to Juliet so readily suggests that he was not at all in love with Rosalind but more in love with the idea of being in love. One trait that can be seen in Romeos character is immaturity. The spontaneous side of him controls his practicality making him behave much like a child in that he acts before he thinks and is unwilling to take the consequences for his actions, he chooses to blame his misfortune or the stars or fate instead. An example of this can be found in Act 3 Scene 1, after he has killed Tybalt and realises how he has jeopardised his new marriage he cries out O, I am fortunes fool. This event also reinforces the theory that he is quicker to act than he is to think. Such qualities in Romeo affected his decision making, for example (Act 1 Scene 2) he does not think for long about the option to go tot the Caplets party or not, he decided to go to the party where the he meets Juliet for the first time. Similarly he asks her to marry him upon an impulse without thinking of the practicality of the situation. Again in Act 3 Scene 1 he chooses to kill Tybalt on a whim, this also proposes a subconscious yearning for drama in his life. Juliet is the only child of Old Capulet and his wife, she is a young teenager around the age of thirteen years old. Juliet falls in love with Romeo at the Caplets feast. Nurse is her friend and nanny; she was employed to look after Juliet from birth. Tybalt is Juliets cousin. Juliet is a gentle girl, she is loyal, can think for herself and usually obeys her parents. She is practical as she knows her parents wish her to marry the County Paris, whom she does not love, and so asks Romeo to marry her which will stop her marriage to the county Paris going ahead and let her stay with the one she loves. Sometimes she does not think of the penalties of her actions but mostly does. She shows her loyalty to Romeo by taking the vile risking everything rather leading a safe life, this also shows that she is passionate about everything, she could not bear to live her life with no feeling, no Romeo. She shows her loyalty and love at the balcony scene, .u26c24026fccd20e538e0364f1022f45c , .u26c24026fccd20e538e0364f1022f45c .postImageUrl , .u26c24026fccd20e538e0364f1022f45c .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u26c24026fccd20e538e0364f1022f45c , .u26c24026fccd20e538e0364f1022f45c:hover , .u26c24026fccd20e538e0364f1022f45c:visited , .u26c24026fccd20e538e0364f1022f45c:active { border:0!important; } .u26c24026fccd20e538e0364f1022f45c .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u26c24026fccd20e538e0364f1022f45c { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u26c24026fccd20e538e0364f1022f45c:active , .u26c24026fccd20e538e0364f1022f45c:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u26c24026fccd20e538e0364f1022f45c .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u26c24026fccd20e538e0364f1022f45c .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u26c24026fccd20e538e0364f1022f45c .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u26c24026fccd20e538e0364f1022f45c .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u26c24026fccd20e538e0364f1022f45c:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u26c24026fccd20e538e0364f1022f45c .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u26c24026fccd20e538e0364f1022f45c .u26c24026fccd20e538e0364f1022f45c-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u26c24026fccd20e538e0364f1022f45c:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Anton Chekhov - The Beggar Commentary Essay The orchard walls are high and hard to climb And the place death, considering who thou art. (Act 2 Scene 2) Juliets choices also depend on her characteristics. Her practicality and impulsiveness helped her to marry Romeo. Through loyalty she takes the potion and it is through passion that she dies for him. Friar Laurence is the head friar for the whole of Verona, Caplets and Montagues alike. He is quite elderly considering the average age of death in the time and place. The Friar is likely to know everyone in the play but the only relationships that are known to the audience are Romeo, Juliet, Nurse, and Friar John. Friar John is a more inferior friar to the Friar Laurence and he could not deliver the message to Romeo because he was stuck in a quarantine house.